Face Procedures
Skin Procedures
Body Procedures
Breast Procedures
Header Pic

Fitness model asks about implant size

October 20th, 2011

I have seen my ps two times now and can’t decide on the implant. I am already a 34c but compete nationally in bikini fitness comps and loose my boobs. I’m scared of being too big but would love to be a dd. I want the fullness on top but not fake round and to have cleavage again. I’m 5″6 120 pounds and very athletic. I know it’s hard to recommend an implant when you haven’t seen me but if you could what would you recommend, 371 moderate plus silicone or 450 high profile silicone? Thank you!

There is no right or wrong answer to what size you should pick. The final choice is of course entirely up to you and your preferences and tastes. Having said that, there are some considerations that you should be aware of. The larger the implant the more like an implant and the less natural the appearance becomes. By definition the most natural looking breast is one that has no implant. If you have an adequate amount of breast tissue over the implant then you can increase the implant size without looking “fake”. In my opinion, the silicone implants give a more natural appearance even at slightly larger sizes. Since you become very thin/lean at the time of a competition then you may consider placing the implant under the pectoralis major muscle. This will provide additional “padding” or coverage over the implant and lessen the implant look. Long term you also have to consider the implications of the size and weight of the implant. The larger the implant, the more the tissues are stretched to cover the implant and the more weight that those tissue have to support. Thinner tissues have a lessened ability to support weight than thicker tissues have. Consequently, a larger implant is more likely to stretch the tissues of the breast, increase the likelihood of sag and increase the likelihood of a poorer cosmetic result as time goes on. Unfortunately, no one can determine exactly at what size these problems may occur for any particular individual. That depends upon implant size/weight, individual tissue characteristics, tissue thickness, previous stretching of breast tissues either from pregnancy and/or weight gain and also how conscientious a woman is about wearing a bra for support. All these factors and other play a role in determining what the long term results will be for any particular individual.

Lumiere on the Today Show

October 18th, 2011

Watch NBC’s the today show on Thursday of this week (10/20/2011) where they will feature one of our favorite skin care products from Neocutis. Lumiere, a bio-restorative anti-aging eye cream with PSP from Neocutis has been clinically shown to restore the appearance of stressed and puffy skin thereby reducing dark circles. It contains a mixture of essential skin nutrients, growth factors, interleukins and antioxidants.

Liposuction linked to lower triglycerides

September 29th, 2011

Liposuction linked to lower triglycerides
Sep 29, 2011
By: Bill Gillette
Cosmetic Surgery Times E-News

Denver — Liposuction patients may experience a reduction in triglyceride levels and white blood cell counts, possibly decreasing their risk for heart disease, stroke and diabetes, Globe Newswire reports.

A new study, results of which were presented here last week at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) annual conference, measured triglyceride and cholesterol levels in 322 patients undergoing liposuction and/or a tummy tuck. Most of the patients, 71 percent, had liposuction only. Triglyceride levels in patients with normal preoperative levels were unchanged. However, patients with at-risk levels, defined as greater than or equal to 150 mg/dl, experienced an average postsurgery reduction of 43 percent — about twice the effect achieved with a commonly prescribed drug.

The study also found that white blood cell counts decrease an average of 11 percent after the procedure.

Globe Newswire quotes Eric Swanson, M.D., ASPS Member Surgeon and study author, as saying, “For years, it has been assumed that ‘visceral fat’ surrounding the internal organs has greater metabolic importance and is more directly linked to cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk than ‘subcutaneous fat’ that lies under the skin. These new findings support recent studies suggesting subcutaneous fat, which can be reduced by liposuction, is just as metabolically important.”

Dr. Swanson noted that the study’s findings do not mean liposuction can replace medications in patients with very high triglyceride levels. The study emphasizes the need for further research to determine whether these favorable changes in triglyceride and white blood cell levels translate to reduced health risk.

FDA says silicone implants are safe, MRI screening unrealistic

September 8th, 2011

After two days of discussion and testimony about how to improve silicone breast implant study compliance, agency officials said silicone breast implants were safe and the studies would continue. “Women should feel assured that the F.D.A. continues to believe that currently marketed silicone breast implants are safe,” said William Maisel, MD, MPH, chief scientist in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, in remarks after the meeting. “The current post-approval studies will continue. The FDA is committed to seeing them completed and making sure the follow-up rates improve.”

Many experts at the hearings sighted the current labeling for MRI screening as unrealistic for healthy, asymptomatic patients. The panel agreed that patients should no longer be told that they should get an MRI three years after getting implants and every two years following. “F.D.A. continues to believe, as does the panel, that M.R.I. is the gold standard for evaluating breast implants for silent rupture,” Dr. Maisel said. “But there was consensus among the panel that the requirements for ongoing M.R.I.’s should be removed.”

Towards the end of the final day of the hearings, the FDA panel commented that they were impressed by the organization of the two plastic surgery societies, our message and our efforts to generate data and address important issues such as international registries, labeling compliance, patient confidentiality, and informed consent.

Chocolate Good for the Heart and Brain

August 29th, 2011

Michael O’Riordan

August 29, 2011 (Paris, France) — In a city renowned for its love of food, it is only fitting that researchers presented the results of a new study in Paris, France, showing that chocolate is good for the heart and brain. In a presentation at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2011 Congress, British investigators are reporting that individuals who ate the most chocolate had a 37% lower risk of cardiovascular disease and a 29% lower risk of stroke compared with individuals who ate the least amount of chocolate.

In the study, published online August 29, 2011 in BMJ to coincide with the ESC presentation, Dr Adriana Buitrago-Lopez (University of Cambridge, UK) and colleagues state: “Although overconsumption can have harmful effects, the existing studies generally agree on a potential beneficial association of chocolate consumption with a lower risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Our findings confirm this, and we found that higher levels of chocolate consumption might be associated with a one-third reduction in the risk of developing cardiovascular disease.”

In this meta-analysis of six cohort studies and one cross-sectional study, overall chocolate consumption was reported, with investigators not differentiating between dark, milk, or white chocolate. Chocolate in any form was included, such as chocolate bars, chocolate drinks, and chocolate snacks, such as confectionary, biscuits, desserts, and nutritional supplements. Chocolate consumption was reported differently in the trials but ranged from never to more than once per day. Most patients included in the trials were white, although one study included Hispanic and African Americans and one study included Asian patients.

Of the seven studies, five trials reported a significant inverse association between chocolate intake and cardiometabolic disorders. For example, individual studies showed reductions in the risk of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 0.43; 95% CI 0.27–0.68), the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.50; 95% CI 0.32–0.78), and the risk of incident diabetes in men (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.43–0.97).

Overall, the pooled meta-analysis results showed that high levels of chocolate consumption compared with the lowest levels of chocolate consumption reduced the risk of any cardiovascular disease 37% (RR 0.63; 0.44–0.90) and stroke 29% (RR 0.71; 0.52–0.98). There was no association between chocolate consumption and the risk of heart failure, and no association on the incidence of diabetes in women.

The researchers note that the findings corroborate the results of previous meta-analyses of experimental and observational studies in different populations showing a similar relationship between chocolate and cocoa consumption and cardiometabolic disorders.

“These favorable effects seem mainly mediated by the high content of polyphenols present in cocoa products and are probably accrued through the increasing bioavailability of nitric oxide, which subsequently might lead to improvements in endothelial function, reductions in platelet function, and additional beneficial effects on blood pressure, insulin resistance, and blood lipids,” conclude Buitrago-Lopez and colleagues.

FDA says silicone breast implants are safe

August 29th, 2011

On June 22, the FDA issued an updated white paper on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants, stating that “silicone gel-filled breast implants have a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness when used as labeled.”

Millions of People Get Soft Tissue Fillers

July 28th, 2011

The American Society of Plastic Surgery reports that aaproximately 1.8 million procedures using soft tissue fillers (collagen, Juvederm, Sculptra, Radiessee, etc.) were performed in 2010 to enhance the aesthetic appearance of patient faces.
Facial enhancement with soft tissue fillers is an in-office outpatient procedure done with local anesthesia. The procedures take only a few minutes, last for many months to years and are inexpensive. They area great way to enhance your beauty!

Be sure who is doing your plastic surgery and how safe the facility is

February 10th, 2011

Plastic surgery and cosmetic surgery may be elective and it can make you look great and feel good about yourself but it is still surgery. All surgical procedures carry some risks and the potential for complications. It is important for anyone considering plastic surgery to research the physician and the facility where the surgery will be performed. Certification by the American Board of Plastic Surgery means that the surgeon has completed medical school, at least three years of training in an approved surgery residency and has completed an approved plastic surgery residency as well. In addition to this, the board certified plastic surgeon has passed thorough written and oral examinations given by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and has been in practice at least two years.

The following is an article about a physician who is not board certified in plastic surgery performing liposuction in what seems to be a nonregulated facility.

Bellevue clinic sued in liposuction death
By VANESSA HO
SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF

The family of a woman who died after liposuction at a Bellevue (Washington state) clinic has sued the clinic and doctor who did the procedure, a month after the state charged the doctor with unprofessional conduct.

In May of 2009, 28-year-old Aura Javellana went to the Sono Bello Body Contour Center in Bellevue for liposuction of her abdomen and upper arms. During the procedure, the surgeon, Marco Sobrino, failed to monitor how much Lidocaine he gave her, before sending her home alone in a cab after he was done, state health investigators said.

Javellana died in a hotel room the next day. An autopsy showed she died of acute poisoning from Lidocaine, an anesthetic that was injected into her body.

The lawsuit, filed last week in King County Superior Court, accuses Sono Bello and Sobrino of wrongful death, medical negligence and consumer law violations. Much of the lawsuit echoes a charging document filed in November by the state Medical Quality Assurance Commission, whose case is pending against Sobrino.

That document says Sobrino failed to physically evaluate Javallena before the surgery and signed off on the procedure minutes before it began. It says no one adequately explained the risks of liposuction or Lidocaine poisoning to her.

During the procedure, medical investigators said Sobrino administered nitrous oxide and a Lidocaine solution without monitoring Javellana, or documenting the amount administered. The doctor also failed to give the patient replacement fluids and track the amount of “material” removed, said the state.

Sobrino’s medical assistant later said she couldn’t remember the number of solution bags used. But she recalled the procedure took longer than usual, because Javellana was experiencing pain, and Sobrino had to re-inject solution, the charging document said.

After the three-hour procedure, Sobrino left the clinic, without ensuring his patient was in stable condition, investigators said. They said he left Javellana with no nurse, only a medical assistant, and without adequate discharge instructions. The instructions had no follow-up phone number.

After the procedure, Javellana vomited and was drowsy. She was told an adult should pick her up and stay with her for 24 hours, but not the reason why, the state said.

When no one came to pick up Javellana, Sono Bello staff put her in a cab alone, with no clear idea of where she was going, the state said. Investigators blamed the doctor.

“Respondent (Sobrino) is responsible for the actions of Sono Bello staff placing his patient – following three-and-a-half hours of laser liposuction surgery under strong drugs – in a taxicab, without an escort or a caregiver, and without clearly knowing her destination,” wrote Dani Newman, a disciplinary manager for the Medical Quality Assurance Commission.

The lawsuit added a few more allegations to the charges. It said the clinic’s marketing materials misled Javellana into thinking the procedure was safe, simple and “virtually painless.”

Last year, KING-5 reported that Javallena had been engaged, had paid $8,000 for the procedure, and had planned to recover alone in a Bellevue hotel.

A medical director for Sono Bello – a national chain of lipo clinics – told the station that Javellana’s death was an “unfortunate occurrence.” KING quoted the doctor as saying the Lidocaine use was within “accepted guidelines” and that “death” had been listed as a possible side effect in Javellana’s consent form.

The clinic did not return a call for comment Wednesday. But an attorney for Sobrino, Michele Atkins, said the doctor has denied the state’s charges. Atkins said neither Sobrino nor the clinic had been served with the civil complaint, and that privacy laws would prevent Sobrino from commenting on the complaint’s allegations.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Javellana’s estate, and her surviving mother and sister.

Bargain plastic surgery procedure using only local anesthesia but can be dangerous

January 21st, 2011

Nipped, tucked and wide awake?
Bargain plastic surgery procedure uses only local anesthesia but can be dangerous, experts warn

By Sabrina Rubin Erdely

Paulette Hacker couldn’t stop screaming. Lying on her side on a gurney, wearing only a bra and panties, she felt as if she were being stabbed again and again. In a way, she was. Through incisions in her upper back, a stainless steel tube called a cannula was suctioning out her excess fat.

“Please stop! You’re hurting me!” she cried to her doctor. Because although Hacker’s body was limp and her mind bleary from an unknown combination of drugs she’d been given through pills and a gas mask, the 38-year-old was awake partway through the second day of liposuction on her back, underarms, abdomen, hips and neck. That was the whole point: She was undergoing the new and aggressively marketed Awake cosmetic surgery, which is performed under local anesthesia.

“You can’t scream, Paulette,” a gruff voice answered her. Hacker hazily realized that the voice did not belong to her doctor; the man performing her operation was a stranger whom Hacker would later discover was a physician’s assistant. According to Hacker, whose experience is also detailed in a Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, she could see people coming and going into the “operating room”—more like an oversize exam room—at the Rodeo Drive office of Craig Alan Bittner, M.D., a “liposculpture” practitioner in Los Angeles. (Through his attorney, Dr. Bittner strongly denies all of Hacker’s allegations.)

“Move her into the TV room—she’s making too much noise,” a confused and terrified Hacker heard another voice say. Her gurney was rolled down the hall and into a second room, where she could see the assistant jab her while he watched a basketball game playing in the background on a wall-mounted television. The volume was cranked up loud enough to drown out her cries.

After the five-hour operation, Hacker says the assistant and an office clerk yanked her to her feet and squeezed her into compression garments. Dazed and sobbing, she struggled into her clothes and found herself face-to-face with a beaming Dr. Bittner. The doctor gently asked why she was crying, she says. Then he maneuvered her beside him and told her to smile for a photo.

Marketed as cheaper, more medically advanced
Hacker had been excited to fly down two days earlier from Sacramento, California. The stay-at-home mom weighed 233 pounds and was trying to slim down; she’d lost 22 pounds on her own through diet and exercise—mostly jogging—and now felt she could use some help. But she’d never had elective surgery before and feared having general anesthesia.

Surfing the Web, Hacker had discovered the Awake procedure, which was advertised as a cheaper and more medically advanced alternative to lipo—and, for those inclined, to abdominoplasty and breast enhancement, too. The price was right: Awake lipo with Dr. Bittner would cost only about $700 for each body part, versus about $3,000 if she had regular plastic surgery. She found it comforting that the lipo would be performed in a doctor’s cozy office, not in an intimidating outpatient surgical center or hospital. Best of all to Hacker, Awake ads promised that patients would remain lucid throughout the operation and even be able to interact with their doctor. “I liked the idea that I’d be awake and in control,” Hacker remembers. “The surgery really looked like it was for me.”

Unfortunately, the procedure may not have been designed to meet her needs, but rather the doctors’. “The reason for the ‘awake’ portion of it has nothing to do with improving patient comfort,” says Joseph M. Gryskiewicz, M.D., of Minneapolis, chair of the emerging-trends committee of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS). “It has to do with doctors not needing to involve an anesthesiologist.” General anesthesia is expensive, and the specialists who provide it prefer to work in hospitals or clinics that have met high safety standards. Awake surgery has become a way for doctors who lack hospital privileges—but who want to cash in on the plastic surgery market—to exploit a loophole by performing the operations in the privacy of their offices. “This is just a gimmick by people who can’t operate their way out of a wet paper bag,” Dr. Gryskiewicz argues.

Hacker had chosen Dr. Bittner’s medi-spa after studying his website, which showcased his Johns Hopkins education, testimonials and pictures of smiling patients beside the tall, tan doctor. Hacker checked to make sure Dr. Bittner was qualified, and there it was: “board-certified.” She didn’t realize that he was a board-certified radiologist. A non-plastic-surgery background is the norm for Awake practitioners, who tend to be family physicians, OBs, ophthalmologists, pathologists—any doctor willing to shell out up to $7,000 for two-day training courses held around 30 times a year by a group of recently formed professional associations.

It’s all emblematic of a growing problem of amateurism in the plastic surgery field, warns Michael F. McGuire, M.D., a director of the American Board of Plastic Surgery, the group that certifies plastic surgeons. In Southern California, 40 percent of liposuction practitioners had no training in the procedure before entering practice, according to a 2010 study in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by surgeons at Loma Linda University Medical Center in California. The study found that the most numerous providers of lipo after plastic surgeons were otolaryngologists—ear, nose and throat doctors. And a 2008 review of liposuction-related fatalities in Germany concluded that in cases in which patients died, “lack of surgical experience was a notorious contributing factor,” especially when it came to doctors’ failing to identify complications.

Breast augmentation takes that risk to an even higher level, Dr. McGuire says, because of the host of emergencies that could arise, including blocked airways, blood pressure changes or collapsed lungs. And full tummy tucks are the most invasive of all, risking pulmonary embolism and abdominal perforation; Dr. McGuire calls it “inconceivable that anyone would do such a major procedure under anything less than a light general anesthesia.” He cites Awake surgery as part of a disturbing trend of non–plastic surgeons attempting procedures that have not been thoroughly tested—such as the not-yet-FDA-approved “stem cell face-lift,” and Macrolane injectable breast enhancement—and unabashedly touting them to the public as the Next Big Thing. “Awake surgery is a carnival sideshow event,” Dr. McGuire says. “Your life could be at stake with some of these kooks.”

Patients alert and have input, but also agony
An Awake breast-implant surgery in the Plano, Texas, office of Jeffrey C. Caruth, M.D., often starts with a small dose of 5 or 10 milligrams of Valium, to relax the patient. “If they take too much sedative, they’re going to have trouble picking out a size,” says Dr. Caruth, a board-certified ob/gyn who has performed more than 200 Awake breast jobs since his training course in May 2008 (as well as 1,000 Awake liposuctions, charging up to $5,000 per surgery). Using a thin needle, Dr. Caruth injects each breast with a small amount of the anesthetic fluid lidocaine. When the area numbs, he makes his first incision. There’s no anesthesiologist and, unlike with IV-administered “twilight sedation,” no drip that can be adjusted to render a patient unconscious if she’s in pain.

“They’re totally alert,” Dr. Caruth says. “It’s actually a lot of fun; we play music and talk.” He says his patients feel nothing as he uses a cannula to infiltrate both breasts with tumescent fluid—a solution of saline, lidocaine and epinephrine—and makes more incisions. Next, they feel pressure and pulling as he stretches the skin and muscle to create a pocket under the muscle large enough for the implants. Then comes the climactic moment: The patient’s gurney is ratcheted upright so she can face a mirror and see her chest inflated with temporary sizers. The doctor ushers in her partner, family or friends to help her decide if she’s happy with her new silhouette before proceeding with the implants.

This is the driving reason women choose Awake breast surgery, according to Dr. Caruth. “They want to have input. When you go shopping, you don’t take something off the rack, throw it in the sack and go home. You try it on first,” he points out. “Women are picky. It’s like shopping for a new dress or a pair of shoes.” He consults with patients before surgery about what’s feasible, but the ultimate decision comes while they’re under the knife.

A patient’s autonomy—her ability to exert control over her own body—is a huge selling point, emphasized again and again on the websites of Awake practitioners. But the idea of asserting your rights on the operating room table is misguided at best, says Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., president of the National Research Center for Women & Families. “A woman lying there is not in any position to be giving advice to the surgeon,” she exclaims. “To make it sound like empowerment? The mind reels.”

For one thing, when a patient is sedated with Valium or Percocet, her judgment is clouded, making her more prone to irrational decisions or to being overly influenced by the onlookers, says Herluf Lund, M.D., a plastic surgeon in St. Louis who has researched the safety and design of breast implants. Dr. Lund watched a video of an Awake breast surgery at an ASAPS conference—and says the roomful of doctors was aghast. “The patient looked as if she’d had about 10 stiff margaritas” as she contemplated her reflection and—at her doctor’s urging—agreed to go up a size, he recounts.

Dr. Caruth says his patients are completely lucid because of his insistence upon minimal sedation—about half of his patients take no

Valium at all—and that he’s had only two patients who wanted do-overs, both to go bigger. “I know people who say they do Awake breast augmentation and then slam the patient with narcotics,” he says. “That’s not the case here.” But even among patients who aren’t sedated, the time to make reasoned decisions is before surgery, Dr. Lund argues. The operating room is not a shopping mall, after all; if you regret your impulse purchase, you can’t easily go back and return it. “In the consultation room, the C-cup might have made more sense for your body and your life, but in the operating room, you might say, ‘Give me the D!’” Dr. Lund says, adding, “Later, if you’re not happy, the doctor can say, ‘Well, I gave you what you wanted.’”

Another Awake premise is that patients are smart to avoid general anesthesia, which causes one death per 200,000 to 300,000 anesthetics given, the Institute of Medicine estimated in 2000. But the large volume of lidocaine used during an Awake surgery poses its own risks. “The amount of local anesthesia needed to anesthetize both breasts comes close to the toxic level,” says Dr. McGuire, who is also immediate past president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Lidocaine has not been extensively studied for breast augmentation, but plastic surgeons say a limit of 35 mg to 50 mg per kilo is wise. Dr. Caruth says he uses about half this amount. But in reviewing more than a dozen cases of Awake surgery gone wrong, Dr. McGuire says patients got more than the limit—and warns that a lidocaine overdose can kill. The idea is that a high dose is safe in Awake surgery because it’s injected into fat, which, having fewer blood vessels than muscle does, is slower to absorb anesthetic. On the other hand, “that slow absorption could mean you’re just delaying peak toxicity,” says Keith J. Ruskin, M.D., professor of anesthesiology at the Yale University School of Medicine. “So theoretically, you could have someone on her way home from surgery, and complications like seizures and heart arrhythmias could arise.”

Without an anesthesiologist present, patients can also end up in agony. Dr. Caruth says he’s able to resolve discomfort with an extra squirt of tumescent fluid. But “you don’t want people with a low threshold for pain,” he adds. If a patient remains uncomfortable after a doctor has already maxed her out on lidocaine, an Awake practitioner is left with only two options: Halt the surgery, or grimace and carry on. Responsible doctors would do the former; Dr. Caruth says he’s only once had to cut a surgery short. But not all surgeons act responsibly, Dr. McGuire says, and if patients were to writhe in pain at the wrong time, it could spell disaster. “The stories are just hair-raising,” he says. “As a surgeon, I don’t want to be operating on screaming people.”

Awake doctors aren’t trained in plastic surgery
After her painful procedures, Hacker returned home bandaged, swollen and sore. “I hurt so much, I couldn’t function,” she says. Her entire body swelled out of control despite her wearing a pressurized garment for eight weeks, and she had neck and back pain so wrenching that she couldn’t lift her young daughter for the next year and a half.

The more facts Hacker learned about her physician, the more disturbed she became. Three other patients had come forward, alleging their Awake liposuction was performed not by Dr. Bittner but by his office manager—a woman with no medical license who was also his girlfriend—and that they emerged injured and disfigured. Those suits were settled or withdrawn. But Dr. Bittner still faces a felony charge for aiding and abetting the practice of medicine without certification, as well as a civil suit brought by Hacker. His lawyer, Benjamin Gluck of Los Angeles, notes that his client has “hundreds and hundreds of satisfied patients” versus “a few unhappy patients who have retracted their more colorful accusations under oath.” Given this, Gluck says he strongly believes the criminal case will resolve in the doctor’s favor.

Hacker also discovered that no doctor should have given her lipo in the first place. It is inappropriate for obese patients because of their higher risk for complications and because surgeons can safely remove only about 5 pounds of fat, Dr. McGuire says. Worse, experts say, doing multiple sessions of lipo on many body parts over sequential days—common among Awake surgeons—is far outside the norm and vastly increases the dangers. When she shared post-op reports from Dr. Bittner’s office with another physician, Hacker learned her blood pressure went so high during the procedure she could have had a stroke. “This was all about greed, not about taking care of patients,” she says.

The main organization pushing the Awake-training gold rush is the American Academy of Cosmetic Gynecologists in Tucson, Arizona—a group with an official-sounding title, but one that is actually open to any ob-gyn willing to pay $300 in dues. Founded seven years ago, the “academy” quickly attracted so many other specialists clamoring to join that other organizations sprouted up to accommodate them—the National Society of Cosmetic Physicians, which now boasts 1,200 members, as well as the American Academy of Cosmetic Family Medicine and the American Academy of Cosmetic Dermatologists. A fifth group, the National Society of Cosmetic Plastic Surgeons, contradicts its name by asking only that applicants be practicing “physicians,” not plastic surgeons. (In contrast, doctors hoping to join more prestigious, long-standing societies like the ASPS and the ASAPS must be board-certified in plastic surgery, engage in continuing education and be sponsored by current members.)

In a surprise twist, reporting revealed that despite their various names, all five Awake groups seem to be the same organization, listed at the same Tucson address, sharing phone numbers and faculty. An employee who answered the phone refused to reveal the groups’ leadership, saying only that the director’s name was “Brad” and that the groups declined to comment.

The linked organizations offer two-day courses in Awake liposuction ($5,000), tummy tucks ($7,000) and breast augmentation ($7,000). Among the instructors is Anil Gandhi, M.D., a general surgeon in Cerritos, California, who is not board-certified in any field. Dr. Gandhi’s workshop—which includes lectures on start-up costs, promotional materials and handling the dissatisfied patient—is complete after 22 hours. It takes more than five years in a residency program to train surgeons to do breast augmentation.

The threat to patients is not theoretical: After a 37-year-old Florida woman went into shock and died after undergoing lipo with a doctor trained only by short courses designed for gynecologists, the state board of medicine found that “these courses do not provide adequate training to develop the proper surgical judgment” on who is a good candidate, what form of anesthesia is safest for her and how to avoid and react to complications.

Many surgeries done in unsafe facilities
Not only do Awake practitioners work outside their area of expertise, but many operate in facilities with few safety standards. Most facilities outfitted for moderate anesthesia and up are accredited by one of the major nonprofit organizations that oversees safety and doctor training. But because Awake practitioners use only local anesthesia, they often skip accreditation, too. “Do they know anything about sterility, about occupational health and safety standards, about infection control?” asks Lawrence S. Reed, M.D., immediate past president of the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities in Gurnee, Illinois. “Because they’re not accredited, there’s no way of knowing what goes on in their offices.”

Unless, of course, something goes wrong—as happened in the office of Sean Su, M.D. Trained as a family physician, Dr. Su opened a clinic in Las Vegas called the Skin + Body Institute and advertised a “Makeover Wish” contest, the winner of which would get free Awake implants and then shill for his website. The prize went to a 29-year-old who explained in an entry essay that she suffered from low self-esteem, partly due to marital problems.

State authorities would soon come to call her Patient A. During her surgery in April 2009, Patient A experienced “significant pain and anxiety” for eight grueling hours, according to the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, which investigated her complaint. She was slow to heal—and seven weeks after surgery, her right implant started to pop out of its incision, says Douglas Cooper, executive director of the board. Dr. Su then performed yet another painful eight-hour Awake surgery, during which he washed the infected breast pocket, then returned the implant to her chest—right along with any bacteria that might have been left clinging to the implant.

Little surprise, then, that Patient A was admitted two weeks later to Sunrise Hospital for emergency surgery for a breast infection. As the surgeons removed her implants, they were shocked by what they saw. According to the investigators’ preliminary findings, Dr. Su had created a pocket too small for the implant. His incisions were “jagged and uneven” and three times longer than appropriate. And he’d left behind an “inexplicable mass of sutures” along the tissue of her right chest wall, increasing the odds for infection.

The board also discovered a second patient of Dr. Su’s with a similar complaint: a 25-year-old who’d also undergone an eight-hour Awake breast surgery, followed by serious infection. Investigators found an unsterile clinic with a canister of days-old liposuction waste left in a procedure room and expired tools and medications, including the lidocaine used for Awake procedures.

In March 2010, the board of medical examiners found Dr. Su guilty of malpractice, keeping inaccurate records and trying to deceive board staff. Yet his penalty didn’t seem that bad. He had to reimburse the cost of his $25,000 investigation, pay a $4,500 fine and serve out 18 months’ probation, during which he is barred from practicing or supervising cosmetic procedures. He is free to once again do family medicine and told self in an email that he has fixed the conditions in his office and, when his probation ends, he plans to restart his aesthetic practice, too: “I had no other alternative but to accept their agreement due to lack of finances for a prolonged defense with a biased medical board” driven by “antiquated physicians not up-to-date with knowledge in the advancement of safer treatments.” There is a tendency for plastic surgeons to “protect their turf from outsiders,” Dr. Su added. “As always will be the case, such pioneering physicians as myself will be criticized when known complications occur and will thus be judged harshly and unfairly.”

A few state medical boards have become concerned enough to try to stem the tide of doctors’ “scope drift” into cosmetic surgery. After three liposuction patients died in the care of an internist in Anthem, Arizona, that state’s board was the first to draft guidelines reminding doctors that, upon expanding their practices into new areas, they need to be competent in those areas, says the board’s executive director, Lisa Wynn.

In North Carolina, the medical board suspended indefinitely the license of an ear, nose and throat doctor who did a series of substandard plastic procedures and is finalizing a policy that could result in discipline for doctors who venture too far from their expertise. Previously, a rash of liposuction deaths in Florida led to more stringent rules for office surgery. These rules make a small step in the right direction but still rely heavily on doctors’ willingness to adhere to the honor code. With little oversight, “it’s a buyer-beware situation,” Dr. McGuire says.

Just ask Paulette Hacker, who hasn’t been the same since her Awake lipo. Her “bargain” surgery ended up costing $6,000 worth of chiropractors and hyperbaric oxygen treatments to ease her pain. And she estimates she’ll spend thousands more to correct the aesthetic damage—because whenever she looks in the mirror, she’s reminded of her Awake mistake.

She’s been left with a lumpy back, a misshapen belly, uneven hips, a neck striated with scar tissue, an asymmetrical jawline and a conga line of polka-dot scars down her sides. “I thought I was an educated consumer, an intelligent person,” Hacker says. “I wish I had known: If they’re not properly trained and certified as a plastic surgeon, they have no business cutting through your skin. If something seems too good to be true, then it is.”

Durability of Saline and Silicone Breast Implants

January 21st, 2011

The Natrelle silicone breast implants filled with cohesive gel are extremely durable and reliable as demonstrated in this video which compares saline, the old style silicone and the newer Natrelle Gel breast implants

http://ow.ly/3Hxgv